Estetika Paradok Arts Painting Wayang Kamasan in The Global Era
Abstract
The struggle of the world of ideas cannot be separated from the development of technology and science as a medium that offers new production processes that are effective, efficient, and economical. To respond to the idea of creating new products that are creative and innovative the aesthetic enlightenment of Kamasan puppet painting is duplicated, obscured into mass production. Paradox aesthetics are a characteristic of global art in the postmodern era that is capable of producing imaging works. To show the novelty of the imaging work is done by giving additional, and insertions. Paradox aesthetic production and reproductive techniques that are done in imitation can produce mass products. Products produced from emulating work are distributed to global markets to meet consumer needs. Artificial works can blindly fade the idealism of art. Art values and norms are obscured by economic values so as to encourage the emergence of new market-oriented art capitalism. Capital and networks owned by capitalists are able to turn art works into tourism and chaotic works, namely works that are not clear (gray), made to order, duplication and imaging. To analyze this research, qualitative methods that are emancipatory with a postmodern aesthetic theory are supported by an eclectic culture industry theory. Discussion: The implications of global art are positive and negative. Positively, global art has the meaning of increasing prosperity, expanding distribution and consumption and developing creative industries and small and medium businesses. Negatively, orders, targets and products of global art mass can block freedom of creativity. In conclusion, global art presents a chaotic and toristic aesthetic paradox to meet consumer needs.
References
Barker, Chris. 2004. Cultural Studies: Theory & Practice, (Nurhadi Translation). Yogyakarta: Discourse Creation.
Bourdieu, 2010. The Field of Cultural Production: A Study of Cultural Sociology (Essays on Art and Literature). (Translation). Yogyakarta: Discourse Creation.
Featherstone, Mike. 2005. Postmodernismedan Budaya Konsumen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Gie, The Liang. 1975. Outline of Aesthetics (Beauty Philosophy). Yogyakarta: Faculty of Philosophy. Gadjah Mada University.
Humar, Sahman. 1993. Getting to Know the World of Fine Arts: About Art, Artwork, Creative Activities, Appreciation, Criticism, and Aesthetics. Semarang.IKIP.
Inkeles, Alex, and Daniel J. Levinson. 1969. "National character: The study of modal personality and sociocultural systems." The handbook of social psychology, Vol.4. Pp. 418-506.
Kayam, Umar. 1981. Community Tradition Arts. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Koentjaraningrat. 1975. Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan (383-384)
Schilling,H. 1993. Die Stadth in der FruhenNeuzeit. Munchen p. 35.
Turner, Bryan, 2000. Teori-Teori Sosiologi Modernitas dan Posmodernitas (terjemahan Baehaqi dan Ahmad Baidlowi). Jogakarta : Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar (p. 366-367).
Zulaikha, Elly. 2008. "Tradition-based Creative Industries in the Era of Globalization", in the International Seminar on the Development of Tradition-Based Creative Industries in Facing Globalization, Indonesian Art Institute. Surakarta: Surakarta Press (p.6).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.